We are working with this new aeration technology to solve some issues with existing aerating methods. We were able to cut 70% of energy cost in a 90k Gallon Aerobic digester in Florida, and the results were_ Before: 50HP blower(Sludge disposal 3-4 times per year) After: 15HP centrifugal pump (NO disposal for over 3 years) The only method that gains efficiency is the deeper the water column, while others are the opposite. Using depth for gaining a higher SOTE of 2.72% per foot. - Recirculating whole water within the tank, no need for extra mixing equipment. - Eliminating issues like_ blower heating, and diffuser clogging, and Reducing Solids Hauling expense. Would love to get your feedback and comments... Thanks in Advance )

Sounds like a wastewater digester? Why was aerobic chosen over anaerobic?

To eliminate the sludge mainly. Our director Bob might be the best person to explain to you the technical reason and benefits.
is there any way that we can connect with you?